Fahad Yaasiin’s critiques of President Hassan Sheikh are not only hypocritical but also highlight a profound lack of self-awareness regarding his own past failures. As a key player in the Farmaajo administration, Fahad was instrumental in enacting policies that led to increased instability and widespread public discontent in Somalia. His leadership at the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) was marred by allegations of oppressive tactics and a blatant disregard for the rule of law, which alienated citizens and severely undermined trust in governmental institutions.
Consolidation of power over public welfare
Instead of prioritizing national security and the welfare of the populace, Fahad and his associates chose to consolidate power, often sacrificing effective governance in the process. The rampant corruption and nepotism that characterized their administration not only exacerbated existing divisions but also fueled the very conflicts that continue to plague Somalia today. This failure to address critical issues while in power directly undermines his credibility as a current critic.
Misplaced blame and lack of accountability
Fahad’s attempt to cast Hassan Sheikh as the sole architect of Somalia’s myriad challenges is a glaring oversimplification that ignores the systemic issues that have persisted for years. His narrow perspective fails to recognize that the choices made during his administration laid the groundwork for the current political quagmire. By shifting the blame solely onto Hassan Sheikh, Fahad displays a troubling reluctance to engage in meaningful selfreflection or accept accountability for his own role in the situation. The Imperative of Self-Reflection
If Fahad genuinely aspires to play a constructive role in Somalia’s future, he must first confront his own legacy and the consequences of his actions. Criticizing the current president without acknowledging his own complicity in past failures perpetuates a damaging cycle of blame and dysfunction. True leadership requires taking responsibility for past mistakes and working collaboratively towards effective solutions, rather than merely adopting the role of a critic from the sidelines.
A call for constructive engagement
For the sake of Somalia’s progress, Fahad should shift his focus from divisive rhetoric to constructive dialogue and support for the current administration’s efforts. Engaging in discourse that fosters unity and collaboration is essential, especially in a time when the nation desperately needs reform. His continued insistence on playing the blame game not only detracts from the urgent need for collective action but also undermines any potential for meaningful change.
Conclusion
In light of these considerations, it is imperative that Fahad Yaasiin reevaluates his approach. The Somali people deserve leaders who are willing to take responsibility for their actions and work towards building a better future. Until he is willing to acknowledge his own past and engage in sincere efforts for reform, Fahad should refrain from commenting on politics, as his credibility is severely compromised. The time for accountability is now, and genuine leadership cannot exist in the absence of self-awareness and responsibility.
About the author
Abdi Hilowle (Coowle) is a political analyst specializing in political science. He has contributed to various publications and policy platforms on state building, democratic transition, and post conflict issues. He is also a lecturer at university.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official stance of Caasimada Online or its members.
